<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Graphic Euphoria&#187; ie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/tag/ie/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Detect Internet Explorer 6 (IE6) and other popular browsers with Mootools</title>
		<link>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-internet-explorer-6-ie6-and-other-popular-browsers-with-mootools</link>
		<comments>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-internet-explorer-6-ie6-and-other-popular-browsers-with-mootools#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mootools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mootools is a great, stable, open source javascript library which is maintained by a limited number of proffesional developers. It does have a browser detection class built in but it doesn't natively provide a method to detect the version of Internet Explorer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[One of the top keyword searches on this blog is &#8216;<strong>detect ie6 mootools</strong>&#8216;; As popular as this search term is, it&#8217;s not actually covered, so this post should fill that gap!

<a title="visit mootools.net" href="http://mootools.net/" target="_blank">Mootools </a>is a great, <strong>stable</strong>, <strong>open source javascript librar</strong>y which is maintained by a limited number of proffesional developers. It does have a <strong>browser detection</strong> class built in but it doesn&#8217;t natively provide a method to detect the version of <strong>Internet Explorer</strong>.

The <strong>Mootools </strong>developers are code purists; Extending their browser class would be easy but they do not want to do it. They do provide a method to get the <strong>browser </strong>build and this could be used along with the remaining <strong>browser </strong>string to work out the version. Essentially, they like to keep their code relevant and streamlined.

In a previous post i covered how to <strong><a title="how to detect IE6 with one line of javascript" href="http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6" target="_self">detect IE6</a></strong><a title="how to detect IE6 with one line of javascript" href="http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6" target="_self"> with one line of </a><strong><a title="how to detect IE6 with one line of javascript" href="http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6" target="_self">Javascript</a></strong>. This solves the problem where later builds of <strong>IE6</strong> can show a browser string similar to <strong>IE7</strong>.

This can be combined with the <strong>Mootools </strong>browser class to produce browser variables.
<pre name="code" class="javascript">//declare global variables
var WEBKIT = Browser.Engine.webkit;
var GECKO = Browser.Engine.gecko;
var OPERA = Browser.Engine.presto;
var IE = Browser.Engine.trident;
var IE6 = (navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase().indexOf('msie 6') != -1)
&amp;&amp; (navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase().indexOf('msie 7') == -1);

//test variables (delete)
if(WEBKIT) alert("WEBKIT");
if(GECKO) alert("GECKO");
if(OPERA) alert("OPERA");
if(IE) alert("IE");
if(IE6) alert("IE6");</pre>
Placing this code at the top of your <strong>JavaScript </strong>include will give you simple global  <strong>boolean </strong>variables for each <strong>browser </strong>platform. Creating one variable per <strong>browser </strong>at the very start means the calls to the <strong>browser </strong>class are limited to one and the detection script is ran only once. It also means you have very simple and easy to remember variables to use throughout your code.<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sidonaldson?i=http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-internet-explorer-6-ie6-and-other-popular-browsers-with-mootools" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-internet-explorer-6-ie6-and-other-popular-browsers-with-mootools/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save IE6 &#8211; if only Internet Explorer 6 was as good as this site</title>
		<link>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/save-ie6-website</link>
		<comments>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/save-ie6-website#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like every other web designer i can't wait for Internet Explorer 6 to be gone. There are some people who do not share this view. Maybe IE6 does have some good points. Just maybe it might be worth saving...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a title="Save IE6 screenshot" href="http://www.saveie6.com/"><img src="http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/uploads/2009/04/ie6-save.jpg" alt="Save IE6 screenshot" width="600" height="223" /></a>

Just like every other <strong>web designer</strong> <a href="http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/is-ie6-dead-how-much-longer-do-we-have-to-wait">i can&#8217;t wait for Internet Explorer 6 to be gone</a>. There are some people who do not share this view. Maybe <strong>IE6 </strong>does have some good points. Just maybe it might be worth saving&#8230;

visit <a title="visit http://www.saveie6.com/" href="http://www.saveie6.com/" target="_blank">Save IE6</a>

Ha! Tongue is definately in cheek.
Forget about <strong>IE6 </strong>for a second and you are looking at a nice site, it even works perfectly in <strong>IE6</strong>. Check out the download link where you are forced to complete a compatibility test first and then sign the petition.

I&#8217;d like to think the writing is on the wall for <strong>IE6 </strong>and that it won&#8217;t be around for much longer. In that case it really does need your help. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s too late!<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sidonaldson?i=http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/save-ie6-website" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/save-ie6-website/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Analyitics &#8211;  fix the &#8216;_gat&#8217; is undefined problem in IE6 with Mootools</title>
		<link>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/google-analyitics-fix-the-_gat-is-undefined-problem-in-ie6-with-mootools</link>
		<comments>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/google-analyitics-fix-the-_gat-is-undefined-problem-in-ie6-with-mootools#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mootools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Analytics is a fantastic, totally free, web tracking service provided by Google. It works by embedding a javascript include at the bottom of your page which loads Google's tracking code. The code then passes all your tracking information to the Anaylitics cloud where it is digested and returned in the web-app.
The Problem

The code has to be included just before your closing body tag, this is because Google doesnt want to hold up your page loading while it crunches this data, by placing it there it guarentees 99% of your page has finished loading. This works perfectly in almost all cases but there have been exceptions. The only time i have come across a problem was when i was testing a site on Internet Explorer 6. I kept recieving this error: '_gat' is undefined]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<strong>Google Analytics</strong> is a fantastic, totally free, <strong>web tracking</strong> service provided by <strong>Google</strong>. It works by embedding a <strong>Javascript </strong>include at the bottom of your page which loads Google&#8217;s tracking code. The code then passes all your tracking information to the <strong>Analytics cloud</strong> where it is digested and returned in the <strong>web-app</strong>.
<h3>The Problem</h3>
The code has to be included just before your closing body tag, this is because Google doesn&#8217;t want to hold up your page loading while it crunches this data, by placing it there it guarantees 99% of your page has finished loading. This works perfectly in almost all cases but there have been exceptions. The only time i have come across a problem was when i was testing a site on <strong>Internet Explorer 6</strong>. I kept receiving this error:
<pre>'_gat' is undefined</pre>
This can only be created when the code tries to call the <strong>Analytics </strong>code before it is launched. Basically, it&#8217;s is trying to call the function _gat too soon. Google have tried to fix this by adding a <strong>Javascript </strong>&#8216;try&#8217; function.
<pre name="code" class="html">&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
	var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
	document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
	try {
		var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UX-XXXXXX-X");
		pageTracker._trackPageview();
	} catch(err) {}
&lt;/script&gt;</pre>
This helps as the code &#8216;tries&#8217; to run the function and if it can&#8217;t then it runs the catch command. This works because it doesn&#8217;t create any other errors and the site will continue operating normally. The only problem is no tracking information will be passed.
<h4>Fixing it with Mootools</h4>
Firstly, more and more websites are using <strong>Javascript </strong>to provide better <strong>interactivity </strong>and <strong>functionality </strong>so there is a good chance you are already using a <strong>library </strong>in your site. Secondly they provide <strong>core functions</strong> which can detect when the page&#8217;s DOM is ready and when the page itself has actually finished loading. There a couple of things that can improved by converting this code to use a popular <strong>Javascript </strong>framework such as <strong>Mootools</strong>. Page load speed should be improved as we try to insert the tracking code after the page has completely finished loading and has been initiated. As a result we can also hope to improve the code performance by making sure the code has been downloaded before trying to run it.

Using <strong>Mootools </strong>we simply add a new <strong>Javascript </strong>assets into the page using the &#8216;addEvent&#8217; function and then run the <strong>analyitics </strong>function calls when it has loaded.
<pre name="code" class="javascript">
window.addEvent('load', function() {
	var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
	new Asset.javascript(gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js", {
		onload: function() {
			try {
			var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UX-XXXXXX-X");
			pageTracker._trackPageview();
			} catch(err) {}
		}
	});
});</pre>
As you can see, I have left the try function in, this is to protect against the same problem we faced initially. Only this time the chance of it happening has greatly reduced. Another benefit of using this method is that you can remove the tracking code from your HTML template or masterpage. Now it is simply added into your <strong>Javascript </strong>include instead. If you use <strong>analytics </strong>to track your <strong>AJAX </strong>calls then it helps that all your code is in the same place!

I hope you find this useful, please leave a comment if you know of any improvements or think you know a better method.<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sidonaldson?i=http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/google-analyitics-fix-the-_gat-is-undefined-problem-in-ie6-with-mootools" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/google-analyitics-fix-the-_gat-is-undefined-problem-in-ie6-with-mootools/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detect ALL versions of internet explorer 6 with one line of javascript!</title>
		<link>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6</link>
		<comments>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the projects i am currently working on required me to determine if the user's browser was Internet Explorer 6 or not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[One of the projects i am currently working on required me to determine if the user&#8217;s <strong>browser </strong>was <strong>Internet Explorer 6</strong> or not. The website&#8217;s menu came slightly out of alignment by a few pixels. I would normally use a <strong>conditional statement</strong> to add extra <strong>CSS </strong>but since this was a <strong>javascript </strong>menu my choice was limited to one..

..change the variable by a couple of pixels!

After some quick googling i found a way of doing it by using the <strong>user-agent string</strong>.

<a title="visit the future of web design" href="http://www.thefutureoftheweb.com/blog/detect-ie6-in-javascript" target="_blank">The Future of the Web » Detect Internet Explorer 6 in JavaScript</a>

This seemed perfect until i read the comments and stumbled across something. I was already aware that there are several different versions of <strong>IE6 </strong>and <strong>IE7 </strong>in existance but i didn&#8217;t know that some IE7&#8242;s return &#8216;<strong>msie 6</strong>&#8216; as it&#8217;s user string. An oversight by Microsoft perhaps?

Thankfully the user who pointed this out also offered a solution. Kudos to <strong>James King</strong> (comment number 8)!
<pre name="code" class="javascript">var IE6 = (navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase().indexOf('msie 6') != -1)
 &amp;&amp; (navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase().indexOf('msie 7') == -1)</pre><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sidonaldson?i=http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/detect-all-versions-of-internet-explorer-6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is IE6 dead? &#8211; how much longer do we have to wait!</title>
		<link>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/is-ie6-dead-how-much-longer-do-we-have-to-wait</link>
		<comments>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/is-ie6-dead-how-much-longer-do-we-have-to-wait#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Si</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a question on every modern, aware, dynamic and forward thinking web designers mind..

Is IE6 dead? - yet?

This site is cool, i have no idea who made it or how they calculate the date, but i hope they are wrong! Get IE6 out now!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a question on every <strong>modern</strong>, <strong>dynamic</strong>, <strong>aware </strong>and <strong>forward thinking</strong> <strong>web designers</strong> mind..

<a title="click to view isie6dead.com" href="http://isie6dead.com/" target="_blank">Is IE6 dead?</a> &#8211; yet?

This site is cool, i have no idea who made it or how they calculate the date, but i hope they are wrong! Get <strong>IE6 </strong>out now!<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/sidonaldson?i=http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/is-ie6-dead-how-much-longer-do-we-have-to-wait" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.graphic-euphoria.co.uk/is-ie6-dead-how-much-longer-do-we-have-to-wait/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
